How British Rule was bad for India Essay

angiotensin converting enzyme way in which British Rule did not help India was that they had a detrimental effect on Indian Trade. India at the time was a key producer of cotton scarce when the British came into power they in any(prenominal) case brought cheaper cotton from Britain. This meant that many cotton factories were being forced out of demarcation by cheaper cotton abroad. In a sense the British were deindustrialising India. If British Rule was really good for India, it would have tried to develop the democracy in important areas as such as its trade. However, this is not what Britain did but they hindered the trade. A particular fact proves this point very well. At the get-go of British rule, India exported 1 million yards of cotton from Britain. 3 decades later this depend rose to 450 million yards of cotton.This shows that Britain was destroying Indias trade. Another way in which British Rule was dreary for India was that the British focused similarly much on th e military. Britains utmost concern was for the safety of the British traders in India and then put a lot of Indias resources into developing the military to harbor them. However, as the Western world was industrialising, India was being left behind. This is because they werent having any scientific breakthroughs or any ground-breaking inventions and this was due to the lack of education.Britain wasted too much of Indias resources and money on the military and not equal was put into reforming the education system. This is shown by the fact that 32% of government outgo was on developing the military but that only 1% was consecrate to improving education. Today I have talked to British Rule was bad for India because Britain deindustrialised India and Britain focused too much on the military.