.

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Daniel’s Sonnet 6 vs. Shakespeare’s Sonnet 130 Essay -- comparison com

Daniels praise 6 vs. Shakespe ars praise 130 Daniel wrote a conventional warmth sonnet using the traditional Petrarchan movement of putting the persuasion of love, or the mistress, on a pedestal. Shakespeare dour these ideas on their heads by portraying a mistress who was by no means special and most certainly unappealing. By comparing Daniels Sonnet 6 and Shakespeares Sonnet 130, one may quickly conclude that Daniel s and Shakespeares ideas of the perfect lady and of love differ greatly.. During Daniels time in that respect was a traditional way of writing love poems. Many of these poems talked of an unattaincapable char woman whose love and perfection was so great she could only be considered to be divine. This is exactly what Daniel did. He wrote of an idea of what the perfect love would be using metaphors. Daniel uses metaphors that related to something of great power or energy, such as the sun, writing although her eyes are sunny. Daniel uses the sun to compliment the mystical experience of his mistress. When Daniel talks of the eyes, he is explaining the power that jackpot be seen in her eyes. This of word form is not a realistic portrayal of a woman, but quite a an idea of the kind of love that is so powerful, so heavenly that it is unattainable. Daniel tries to confirm that his mistress has a love so powerful and deep that it can only be an idea. When many people think of an idea of love that is perfect, many would say that women of purity and beauty would be the perfect woman. Daniel states this sight when he says Chastity and Beauty, which were deadly foes. Here Daniel says that his mistress is pure, innocent, and beautiful. He is asking the reader to find a woman that perfect. There also seems to be r... ...false compare that their love is legitimater than his. Shakespeare does not need to falsely compare his woman to someone divine. He expresses his lady as being simple and able to accept his true love. With his use of tradi tional Petrarchan writing, Daniel paints a perfect idea of a woman, one who is immortal and unattainable. Shakespeare, on the other hand mocks this style of writing and creates a vision of a more human woman who has flaws and is anything but perfect. In conclusion, these two writers have different views on what true love is, and the kind of woman they admire. Neither way is wrong, but are simply two contrasting ways of expressing how a man looks at a woman. Works Cited Shakespeare, William. Shakespeares Sonnets. Ed. Katherine Duncan-Jones. New York Thomson Learning, 1997. (Teachers Handout for Daniels Sonnet 6)

No comments:

Post a Comment