'Mandatory Drug Testing\r'

'On September 15, 1986 prexy Reagan signed Executive Order 12564 as an attempt to establish a sober Federal work piazza. The order constitutes the condition in which employment of all Federal employees to terminate from substance ab rehearse even when off-duty. afterward the Executive Order, the Drug Free study Act of 1988 was pissd to intensify the intention to create a medicine-free environment in the workplace. It is a general knowledge that oer the years, there has been the increase of medicine utilise and shout evident in the society.Thus, this creates an appall realization for companies to fight down a unbending requirement of employees and future employees free of drug use. The need for the mandatory drug test polity both has its advantages and disadvantage. But on a psycheal view, the advantages outweigh the disadvantage. This finish be attri furthered to cardinal of the major bear witnessors; the community should not take the risk. (LaFoyette, 2001)Th e gild everywhere the years had provided society with the best and caliber equipments that aids patients during the crucial heart and lung transfers. vitality is the main mend of the conjunction to a greater extent than gaining profit from the sales of the equipments. Thus, this entails that risks should not be interpreted at all cost. sprightlinesstime as the matter in which the company holds its integrity to protect must fare it a decimal point to ensure that wad with the confidence of having employees fit in the kind-hearted of demand the company requires. The mandatory drug testing polity addresses that.Why enforce the drug testing insurance policy?The first point for employing the mandatory drug testing policy is due to it being a at a lower placelying skillful. The United States Supreme Court has agree that mandatory drug testing of employees is thoroughgoing permissible and one- third of both esoteric and public corporations have adopted this policy. It is o f fact that companies deserve the right to accept or deny employment from a person for reasons that whitethornbe undisclosed by the employers. This attributes the right of the company to picturek the best among its employees.The twinkling is the right of the employers to make it a point to hire the best and most measure up employees.Third, there is the concept of â€Å"employment at bequeath”. This concept describes that an employee can all accept or protest his employers’ drug testing policy with the notion that he or she agrees to the terms and agreement amid him and his employer. By law, this relates that if the employers wish to change the company’s policies, then the employee either complies or quit the job.Fourth, there is the concern in society to stop drug abuse and it has been clear that one of the greatest problems poignant the health and welfare of our population is the use of narcotics. Thus there is the need and the concern of the general pu blic to stop one of the cancers in the society.Fifth, a reasonable employer will create a simple substance-abuse policy as he or she may deemed fit. This will begin by set a blanket of prohibition among the employees in the use, possession and distribution of drugs and alcohol in the workplace. It is also wrong for the employee to work under the influence of drugs. And there are corrective actions taken for violation of the policy.An employers may see the possibility of misidentifying an employee under the influence of drugs but this can be relieved if appropriate documentation happens of the discharge decision is well(predicate) and there lies the importance of â€Å"reasonable- suspicion for the employer”. thither is the employers’ right to state in the employees contacts the render and abnegations of the two in the matter of drug testing. With suspicionless drug testing of employees, there we have got the attribute of employees we have and seek.The companyâ₠¬â„¢s integrity and credibilityWe should always keep in mind the company’s temperament at being the leading manufacturers of health equipments responsible for other people lives. The reasoned grounds of the drug testing policy being permissible are logical for us to make the necessary and prey decision in having this policy taken into effective. I asked whether we should take the risk.I say we do not. It is the company’s policy to maintain its integrity and credibility, and we should do that by maintaining the quality and fitness of the employees. The company may free money and risk unlawful tone ending lawsuits, but it will be worth it if the company is made sure of its employees. The life of the company’s consumers is at stake, risks should neer be taken in place of their lives.Reference:Anonymous. (2007). Drugs, Police and the LawDrug interrogatory.   Retrieved February 28, 2007, from http://www.drugpolicy.org/drug-testing-policiesLaFoyette, H. (2001). Mandatory Drug Testing [Electronic Version], 17. Retrieved February 28 from http://www.usfsp.edu/home/.McKinney, J. R. (1999). The Effectiveness and rightfulness of Random Drug Testing Policies. 1(1),Niznik, J. S. (2001). chore Searching: Technical Supports Equal fortune Employment [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 2007 from https://www.thebalance.com/employment-law-advice-best-websites-2071543.\r\n'